Clay Calhoun Webster Essay Research Paper In free essay sample

Clay, Calhoun, Webster Essay, Research Paper In 1816, shortly after the terminal of the War of 1812, the British, who had failed to get the better of the Americans in conflict, attempted to close down the freshly formed American fabrication concern. They were directing over stuffs to the U.S. and highly low monetary values in an attempt to crate a fastness over the U.S. These actions lead to the Duty of 1816, which placed a 20-30 % revenue enhancement on all imported goods, in an effort to protect U.S. industries. Strong argument arose over these issues in Congress, and strong leaders came about with those arguments, in order to stand for the feelings of the different countries in America. These three leaders were Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster. Webster was a representative from the North, a New Hampshire occupant, who strongly opposed the Duty of 1816. The position of the New England district was for some protection, but non the full sum outlined in the duty. We will write a custom essay sample on Clay Calhoun Webster Essay Research Paper In or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Their logical thinking was that New England still maintained many of its trust # 8217 ; s on transportation and trade. Industry had non wholly taken over in those countries, and because the duty would restrict trade in the New England ports, it would straight consequence the New England economic system. Webster took a strong base in opposing this duty for these really grounds, he in order to keeping the well being of the northern provinces. Webster besides stood against Clay # 8217 ; s insisting for better transit amongst the provinces. He went along with the New England belief that better roads would promote migration towards the lands of the West, hence dwindling the population of the Northern provinces. John Calhoun, a representative from South Carolina, besides played a big axial rotation in the congressional arguments in the early 1800’s. A ferocious patriot and former warhawk, he was much in favour of the Duty of 1816. He believed that the South’s hereafter ballad in the custodies of fabrication of cotton and other such merchandises. With England seeking to oppress these industries, he saw the duty as a helpful resource for his part. He subsequently changed his place, opposing the duty as he came to believe that the duty merely benefited the affluent mill proprietors of the North, and did little to assist the South. He looked out for the best involvement of his province and the other provinces of the South. Henry Clay was another strong protagonist of the Duty of 1816. He was a western representative who believed in a system called the # 8220 ; American System. # 8221 ; This system entailed foremost, the protective duty, and so with the benefits of the duty and addition in national industry, the money could so be used to better roads and transit among the provinces. This would increase population flow and the transit of manufactured goods and natural stuffs between the assorted parts. His strong goad for the American System was passed into measure in 1817, but was so vetoed instantly by President Madison. Clay besides played an of import function in the Missouri via media of 1820. He proposed that Missouri be admitted as a slave province, and Maine could so be added a free province, flushing the figure of slave provinces and free provinces. This via media held the state together by a loose twine for many old ages until it was eventually broken at the morning of the Civil War. Clay, Calhoun, and Webster could wholly be accurately described as spokesmen for their several parts. Their positions reflected those of the general population and they were merely looking out for the good of the state.